Grandio SO
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

IFU Link
Claim 1: class I  fillings
Claim 2: class II fillings
Claim 3: class III fillings
Claim 4: class IV fillings
Claim 5: class V fillings
Claim 6: reconstruction of traumatically damaged anteriors
Claim 7: facetting of discoloured anteriors
Claim 8: correction of shape and shade for better aesthetic appearance
Claim 9: locking, splinting of loose anteriors
Claim 10: repairing veneers
Claim 11: restoration of deciduous teeth
Claim 12: core-build-up under crowns
Claim 13: composite inlays

 
 
 
 

Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 1 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
Claim 2:
Rocha Gomes Torres C, Rêgo HM, Perote LC, Santos LF, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Di Nicoló R, Borges AB. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):793-9.

Claim 5:
Nassar AM, Abdalla AI, Shalaby ME. One year clinical follow up of nano filled glass ionomer and composite resin restorations. Tanta Dent J 2014; 11: 21.

Claims 1, 3, 4, 6 - 13: